Skip to main content

Theory of mythical actions

Mythical actions are narrative actions that encode either points of origin or economic actions. This encoding allows multiple decoding.

They can be understood as functional information processes whose data has three basic structures: dramatis personae, objects and narratives.

 Dramatis Personae: men, gods, animals, plants, inorganic beings. They are not mutually exclusive categories. They are the input and output of the functions.

Objects: non-personal material elements (OM), scenes (OE). They are not inputting if they are not accompanied by a person, they are the output of the functions.

Narration: Sequence of functions

Primary actions. x, y, z structures, <a1>, ... <an> actions

    1. Determinative.

X <Det> X, ¬X

    2. Substitute. Change one structure or one function for another.

X <Sust> y

    3. Associative. Between people and objects. Formation of a set of outputs from n inputs.

x1, x2, ... xi <Asoc> (x1, x2,… xi)

    4. Inverse. Take another action as an argument and change input to output

    5. Generative or categorizing. Define or create a structure, by composing two or more actions. The generated structure inherits information from its input.

a1, (a2, a3),… an <Gen> x [a1, a2, a3… an]

    6. Interpretive. Evaluate another function. Its argument is either a structure or another action. Output 1.0

    7. Recursive. It takes itself as an argument.

    8. Noise. Produces random errors in action outputs.


Secondary actions

    1. Dissociative. It is the inverse of the associative.

(x1, x2,… xi) <Disoc> x1, x2,… xi

    2. Traslocative. Dissociate a pair of structures and associate one of them with another space-time scenario of n dimensions.

(x, y) <After> (x, z)

    3. Memory. Recategorization action

    4. Regulations. Denies a set of actions.

    5. Logic.

Could we reduce these 13? Yes: 9th determination, 8th association

Composite:

Ex: Number = Memory * recursive

Ex: Normative * Destructive = Transgressive


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

Ritual, Scientific Experiment and Truth

 Human rituals have their roots in animal behavior, and the animal pattern has its roots in the need for repetition of living organisms, in the cyclical structure of physiological actions. At the human level, ritual behavior involves a delimitation of space and time, as well as a different meaning of both with respect to the spaces and times of everyday experience. From the ritual ceremonies of cold societies, we observe the care and thoroughness of the shaman to determine with precision the spaces, times and elements that intervene in the rite. Sacred space delimits the world, not only as a place of action, but also the scope of meaning of the things contained in that space. It is a space loaded with meaning: there is an order in things. Time itself acquires its meaning in relation to this order of things, and cyclically closes the space in the “tempo” of the rite, a tempo that is a symbol of the tempo of the World. What is not in the rite or is not referable to the rite has no re...

Metalanguages are formal metaphors

  In a logic class, the professor tells his students: "Yesterday, while talking with my Sufi gardener about happiness, we ended up talking about metalanguages, because he said that orchids are 'chambers where light plays between amorous encounters.' I told him: 'You have to be a poet to talk about poetry.' He replied: 'You just have to be human.'" In what way can we say that my gardener is proposing that every metalanguage is a formalized metaphor for its object language and what would be the metaphor for arithmetical addition? Furthermore” -he asks-how does this little narrative show that Kurt Gödel was a Platonist? One student answers: “The gardener uses orchids as a metaphor for biological reproduction, and from this he makes a second-order metaphor at the human level, calling reproduction a loving encounter. The gardener is a Sufi; in Sufi ontology, the word 'encounter' is used as equivalent to 'existence,' a double meaning (Wujud)....