Skip to main content

Preface to the Blog

 Preface to the Book of Mythopoetics and to this Blog

 

I understand philosophical action as a dual process of axiomatic criticism and theoretical construction. When this action is applied to the symbolic constructions of our identity, I call it mythopoetics. For obvious reasons this book cannot but aspire to be a big-scale sketch of an epistemological map of human identity narratives, a schema which I have divided into three parts. In the first two, I define the conceptual structure which will be used in the third to develop a theory of mythical action. The first is a general introduction to the problems of mythology such as they have been dealt with from the point of view of philosophy of religion, linguistics, history, aesthetics and epistemology, merging them all into a more general concept of philosophical anthropology. The second part focuses on the definition of emotions and on the understanding of their centrality in relation to rationality and the structure of myths. From the process of the semantic emotional development of language, I construct a theory of continuous rationality in which animal rituals are understood as protomyths, and human rituals and myths as an n-ary symbolic development of some survival protocols. Both parts are, therefore, a discussion about the necessary conceptual elements needed to understand mythico-ritual structures, defined and dealt with in the third part, where I define the properties of interpretative mimetic actions, or mythical actions, and examine the different configurations they have taken along our symbolic development. The book concludes with an analysis of the general conditionings for the development of future mythical structures.

My ontoepistemological starting point is evolutionist, emergentist and constructivist, a stance which is better expressed by the continuous rationality or emotional continuum theory, of Aristotelian inspiration, which assumes that vital processes display –in different stages of complexity- the property of intelligence.

The book and the Blog, although they try to give a human image from the point of view of immanence, contain elements of transcendental idealism, not only in the line of Immanuel Kant but also in those of Advaita Vedanta of the Hindu Tradition, whose parallels in the tradition Western could be found in Plato and Orphism. The theses of mythical transpersonality correspond to the theses of transpersonality of the psyche and are developed in my book "Path of Beauty."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

Rhapsodies of Anima Mundi: Fear of Death

In the nascent dawn of consciousness, when the human spirit still danced in rhythmic harmony with the grand, elemental pulse of nature, the enigma of cessation—that profound silence we name death—arose as the most formidable of shadows. Yet, it was not then perceived as an absolute, terminal end in the stark, isolated sense we often conceive today. For those early societies, intimately imbricated in the vast and primordial canvas of the Anima Mundi, death was seamlessly woven into the very ur-tapestry of existence as a continuity, a fluid dissolution into the great soul of the world, or a joyous return to a collective paradise, utterly devoid of the strict, solitary individuation that modernity has, unwittingly, imposed upon us. This is not merely the clinical apprehension of biological cessation, but rather a primordial panic before the void, a visceral anguish in the face of the "I's" dissolution and the potential loss of all that imbues life with meaning. Confronted...

Metalanguages are formal metaphors

  In a logic class, the professor tells his students: "Yesterday, while talking with my Sufi gardener about happiness, we ended up talking about metalanguages, because he said that orchids are 'chambers where light plays between amorous encounters.' I told him: 'You have to be a poet to talk about poetry.' He replied: 'You just have to be human.'" In what way can we say that my gardener is proposing that every metalanguage is a formalized metaphor for its object language and what would be the metaphor for arithmetical addition? Furthermore” -he asks-how does this little narrative show that Kurt Gödel was a Platonist? One student answers: “The gardener uses orchids as a metaphor for biological reproduction, and from this he makes a second-order metaphor at the human level, calling reproduction a loving encounter. The gardener is a Sufi; in Sufi ontology, the word 'encounter' is used as equivalent to 'existence,' a double meaning (Wujud)....