According
to Kant the concept of genius has only validity in the artistic realm, not in
the scientific. We can reach the immaculate intellectual heights of Saint
Einstein of Princeton [he uses the example of another father of the Church of
Geniuses (Saint Newton), although it works for our purposes] by simply reasoning
orderly and hard enough, but we could never reach the heights of the artistic
geniuses, for they are nature’s voice transmitting a transcendental message.
Today we
have extended the adjective not only to scientists, but also to race horses, as
Robert Musil noticed in his wonderful book. Life is intelligence (adaptation
and overcoming of problems) as much in
the bacteria as in our more complex symbolic creations. The narrative of the
genius is no more that the modern myth to justify priestly beliefs of social
stratification, old schemes in new disguises.
In order to
maintain the ideal of arête (excellence) (we are symbolic creatures and need a continuous process of symbolic superation), we do not need the Church of
Geniuses, or any other concept of the mythical plane of the universal law. In
fact, the superstitious idea of the genius justifies all sorts of moral abuses,
like those we see in the markets of art or those performed as well by the
scientific experts from its omnipotent institutions. What we call human
knowledge and human stupidity, the genius and the moron, go hand in hand, there
is no need to sanctify any of them, and we usually do it with both.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please write here your comments