Skip to main content

The Myth of the Theory of Everything (TE)



A concept like this, entertained by mainstream physics, is problematic even as a metaphor, for it is postulating some sort of sacred text for reality (R). Beyond the obvious paradoxes -like the one that says that the set of postulates which conforms the theory would contain itself as a postulate- such Pythagorean proposal mistakes the model for the modelled thing. Theories are conceptual models, at best, consistent with their own principles, but not necessarily with our basic intuitions and conceptions (Lebenswelt). An example of this is the mathematical discipline of Analysis, whose foundations sustain the edifice of physics. The difference between the original and the model, something purportedly solved by the traditional platonic appeal to the imperfection of the human sphere in relation to the sphere of the gods, has been expressed in contemporary epistemology as the asymptotic approximation of our science to truth (or reality). But in relation to TE, their supporters seem to forget that there is not (and never could be) a final representation to serve as original for the model, for R is apeironic, so for a TE, the model is not R, but an inductive asymptotically perfected model of previous theories, ever more encompassing. Those theories are only defined in terms of very limited and unconnected (beyond some basic logical principles, which are themselves of biological origin) theories which describe our basic intuitions about the universe. Then TE has nothing to modelize upon beyond the very basic descriptions of movement in relation to conceptual frames. An encompassing theory of the biological dimension of existence (i.e., intelligence) and the so called physical dimension, cannot be obtained from the present scientific paradigms, reductionist or holistic, for there is not a conceptual covering of the social symbolical constructions. Even today, most part of the population (93%, according to estimations) understands the universe in terms of very crude metaphors of parenthood and social bonding: we have projected our cellular constitution and understanding upon the universe and expect to obtain a cellular integrated answer, fit to our needs and harmonious with our hallucinated theories of the past. TE can only be, therefore, postulated as an absolute referent, and we could elaborate models upon it in happy asymptotic approximations. What is the meaning of an absolute model? It is equivalent to postulate the existence of a logico-mathematical reality, TE, which acts like an archangel communicator of R. We have seen already too much of this kind of thinking in ancient mythologies, and science will not benefit from such approach. It is precisely this platonic background what makes the idea of TE so fashionable and popular, for the proposal is perfectly understood in traditional terms: the priests which formulate the intricate TE are today’s geniuses and saints.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

What is Mythopoetics?

  The narrative grew in the process of being told, as myths always do. The Blog has become more labyrinthine over the years. It contains my Mythopoetics book and a few other things. For those who access these texts without knowing anything about Mythopoetics, I am going to post the introduction of the first part, so you can decide if you want to spend your precious time thinking about the identity narratives that we humans have developed over the years. throughout our eventful existence as a species. "Mythological narratives are the only intellectual activity that has been continuously practiced by human beings, a fact that makes them a unique tool for thinking synthetically our evolution as homo-sapiens. In this sense, they are the first valuation settings that humans have made about themselves and their environment, and as such, they have conditioned the ones that have come afterwards, both in form and content. Their communicative function places them at the basis o...

An Epistemological Perspective of Individuation

For the ancient Romans, "Terminus" was the god of boundaries, represented as large stones used to divide and delimit fields. Festivals were held, called Terminalia, in which the stones that "generated" human space were sanctified. Our word "term" is the heir of that god, or better, it is that god incorporated into an everyday space, in our Lebenswelt or world of life. A philosophical term, whatever its semantic content, is the conceptual mark that we make by establishing a referential sign, it is the action of determining, of generating a reference in a mental space, a reference with which we make a sign correspond, or if we deal with a physical space, the correspondence with an object, be it a milestone, a stone, or an indicator sign. Since its beginnings, philosophy has used binary semantic terms as thinking tools, something that analytical psychology has also made good use of. One of the longest-running binary semantic terms for psychology...