Skip to main content

Wakefulness and Creative Imagination

 Is there really a clear line between the so-called dream worlds and the waking world? Isn't

wakefulness another form of dream? Isn't waking another form of sleep in the sense that much of

our waking life is a life of low consciousness (historical, psychological, epistemological, ethical)?

Perhaps we are facing a continuum of experience that only the roughest forms of sensitivity polarize

into two well-separated worlds. The aesthetic experience seems to confirm this hypothesis, and it

should not surprise us since human beings are symbolic creatures.

Only basic emotions are literal insofar as they point to some survival action. The rest is symbol.

If we consider reality as a complex symbol, the traditional border of sleep-wake psychology

vanishes. And what scene do we have before us then? What is experience? Our experience is a

shared myth built from successful survival actions. But beneath these actions is the mystery of life

itself, towering over something equally mysterious that we vaguely call matter. And in the bosom of

life, the mind has arisen, emerging with it new movements of determination of reality. This

continuum of Life-Intelligence, of which we make vague mental representations and of which we

have intense vital representations (but also imprecise), shows a force that seems to be a combination

of the vital and mental worlds, a force that operates in the line of the numinous experience. It has

traditionally been called "creative imagination", or "active imagination". I understand this force as

an impulse of expansion of Life-Intelligence outside the limits of symbols related to everyday

experience, it is a second-order symbolic force, like general abstraction, but endowed with a unique

emotional vitality and directed by a principle of self-mimesis. This creative imagination is no more

illusory function than any other mental map can be. In fact, the intensity of its impulse throughout

our entire existence as a species presents it as a sure guide of our being in the world. Through it

have manifested forms of reality that practical reason would never have revealed. Its action is not

limited to the world of dreams, where it is fully active in most of us, but works in our vigil when we

are able to put aside the urgency of survival. Then, not only our mind but all our self enters a

second-order symbolic experience (a reflection about symbols themselves).

The intensity of the creative imagination will determine the intensity of the aesthetical action.

Such intensity depends on the degree of presence, the actual focusing of consciousness in us.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please write here your comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Metalanguages are formal metaphors

  In a logic class, the professor tells his students: "Yesterday, while talking with my Sufi gardener about happiness, we ended up talking about metalanguages, because he said that orchids are 'chambers where light plays between amorous encounters.' I told him: 'You have to be a poet to talk about poetry.' He replied: 'You just have to be human.'" In what way can we say that my gardener is proposing that every metalanguage is a formalized metaphor for its object language and what would be the metaphor for arithmetical addition? Furthermore” -he asks-how does this little narrative show that Kurt Gödel was a Platonist? One student answers: “The gardener uses orchids as a metaphor for biological reproduction, and from this he makes a second-order metaphor at the human level, calling reproduction a loving encounter. The gardener is a Sufi; in Sufi ontology, the word 'encounter' is used as equivalent to 'existence,' a double meaning (Wujud)....
Post a Comment
Read more

Rhapsodies of Anima Mundi: Fear of Death

In the nascent dawn of consciousness, when the human spirit still danced in rhythmic harmony with the grand, elemental pulse of nature, the enigma of cessation—that profound silence we name death—arose as the most formidable of shadows. Yet, it was not then perceived as an absolute, terminal end in the stark, isolated sense we often conceive today. For those early societies, intimately imbricated in the vast and primordial canvas of the Anima Mundi, death was seamlessly woven into the very ur-tapestry of existence as a continuity, a fluid dissolution into the great soul of the world, or a joyous return to a collective paradise, utterly devoid of the strict, solitary individuation that modernity has, unwittingly, imposed upon us. This is not merely the clinical apprehension of biological cessation, but rather a primordial panic before the void, a visceral anguish in the face of the "I's" dissolution and the potential loss of all that imbues life with meaning. Confronted...
Post a Comment
Read more