Skip to main content

Infinite and Apeiron


George Cantor is credited with the conceptual construction called transfinite numbers, an endomorphization of the concept of infinite within the system of the real numbers (). The tool for the construction was the creation of a synthetic representation of the infinite as a whole, familiar to the Platonist Weltanschauung, whose condition of possibility was the natural number, i.e., individuation: infinite is then the result of an endless aggregation. Of course such a representation is not the actual representation of an intuition but the representation of a continuing iterative process, which by its closed condition (the finite character of the algorithm of counting), seems to have a meaning. Once the infinite is an endomorphic concept of the system, any composition with it will be endomorphic, including the notion of transfinite number.
Infinite aggregates can be constructed either by endless iterative processes or by the postulation of properties to which infinite extensions must follow. But the aggregation of units is a synthesis of a different sort than the one obtained by the postulation of a property which has some supposed extension of individuals. In the first case, we proceed inductively, and the whole obtains its meaning from the finitude of the algorithm, even if it cannot be intuited in its infinite performance. In the second, we proceed holistically, and the parts obtain their meaning in relation to the a priori meaning of the whole, i.e., the property. In the first case, we reificate the whole, in the second, the units or parts.
When the parts are themselves processes of aggregation, the reification gets of second order and all sorts of paradoxes grow, for now we are violating both the intuition of iteration (iterating infinities), and the intuition of property (the finite representation of a pairing, for we apply the possibility of the construction of the concept to infinite extensions). In this framework, we meet all sort of nonsensical postulates that mathematics forces us to take dogmatically (for intuitively does not follow) under the disguise of theorems that follow from ontoteological axioms (axiom of substitution, choice, infinitude, union), such as: an infinite set has the same cardinality as one of its subsets, a postulate that can only have meaning under the reification of the extension of the set, metaphysically, or the reification of the iterative process in a non-intuitive scale, metaphysically also, beyond all life experience.

From a mythopoetical point of view, the concept of infinity is a representation of the concept of apeiron, whose form is conditioned by the ontoepistemology of the myths assigned to the space-time intuitions. When space-time is curved, infinity is bounded, i.e, finitized under a property. When space-time is linear, infinity is unbounded, finitized under a process of iteration. When space-time is liminal, infinity is just apeiron.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

What is Mythopoetics?

  The narrative grew in the process of being told, as myths always do. The Blog has become more labyrinthine over the years. It contains my Mythopoetics book and a few other things. For those who access these texts without knowing anything about Mythopoetics, I am going to post the introduction of the first part, so you can decide if you want to spend your precious time thinking about the identity narratives that we humans have developed over the years. throughout our eventful existence as a species. "Mythological narratives are the only intellectual activity that has been continuously practiced by human beings, a fact that makes them a unique tool for thinking synthetically our evolution as homo-sapiens. In this sense, they are the first valuation settings that humans have made about themselves and their environment, and as such, they have conditioned the ones that have come afterwards, both in form and content. Their communicative function places them at the basis o...

An Epistemological Perspective of Individuation

For the ancient Romans, "Terminus" was the god of boundaries, represented as large stones used to divide and delimit fields. Festivals were held, called Terminalia, in which the stones that "generated" human space were sanctified. Our word "term" is the heir of that god, or better, it is that god incorporated into an everyday space, in our Lebenswelt or world of life. A philosophical term, whatever its semantic content, is the conceptual mark that we make by establishing a referential sign, it is the action of determining, of generating a reference in a mental space, a reference with which we make a sign correspond, or if we deal with a physical space, the correspondence with an object, be it a milestone, a stone, or an indicator sign. Since its beginnings, philosophy has used binary semantic terms as thinking tools, something that analytical psychology has also made good use of. One of the longest-running binary semantic terms for psychology...