Skip to main content

Let's take a trip to a parallel Universe

 I proposed this question to my students.

Let's take a trip to a parallel Universe. Suppose for a moment that since the fifth century before the Christian Era (about 2,500 years ago), human beings had achieved gender equality. 

What science and what technology would we have today?

 

A possible answer. Gender equality implies class equality. Otherwise, a slave woman would not have gender equality in relation to a free man, nor would a slave man have gender equality in relation to a free woman. Since there is only one class in the world, there would be neither rich nor poor people. As there are neither rich nor poor, capital gains would not be generated based on slave labor or underpaid labor. The trade would be fair, with minimal margins of capital gains, the equivalent to whatever the average wage would be. Furthermore, human communities would not have capital gains to generate industries beyond non-slave handicrafts. By having equality worldwide, there would be no wars, we would not need war technology. The control and use of metals and raw materials based neither on trade nor on industry would generate a lower number of produced objects (much lower than those found, say, in Classical Antiquity itself). Our technology would not be anywhere near what we have today in the First World. On the material plane, we would have advanced very little, but our psychological and spiritual capacities would be much more developed than they are today. Neither algebra, linked to commerce, nor calculus, linked to the needs of exploration and conquest of the world, would have been developed. We would have much more artistic mathematics, in many points indistinguishable from what we now call music theory. And therefore, the sciences would be of a very different character. The ecological and population problems would not have occurred. The arts would be at the level of our psychological capacities, etc...

But all this is only on the basis that we have achieved gender equality and therefore human equality at all levels. This equilibrium is as desirable as it is highly unstable. Very little against it would make it collapse. It would be enough for someone to want to dominate someone, even at a very basic psychological level, to break down the whole house of cards. Like the small stone that falls on the mountain and produces the avalanche. The most probable thing is that in a couple of generations after reaching the goal of gender equality, somewhere on the planet that is less favored in resources, or after a famine, someone would start a revolt that would end in war, dragging the balance of all the others. And we would go back to something similar to what we have today.

With great probability, the parallel universe described in the question would end up converging on ours. The solution to our problems is much more difficult than we think. It is necessary to build a new society based on idealistic and egalitarian principles, yes, but perhaps we will have to accept submitting ourselves to a psychological change of greater depth than the one that our social system presents to us right now. Only by changing ourselves can technology change. How do we do that?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

What is Mythopoetics?

  The narrative grew in the process of being told, as myths always do. The Blog has become more labyrinthine over the years. It contains my Mythopoetics book and a few other things. For those who access these texts without knowing anything about Mythopoetics, I am going to post the introduction of the first part, so you can decide if you want to spend your precious time thinking about the identity narratives that we humans have developed over the years. throughout our eventful existence as a species. "Mythological narratives are the only intellectual activity that has been continuously practiced by human beings, a fact that makes them a unique tool for thinking synthetically our evolution as homo-sapiens. In this sense, they are the first valuation settings that humans have made about themselves and their environment, and as such, they have conditioned the ones that have come afterwards, both in form and content. Their communicative function places them at the basis o...

An Epistemological Perspective of Individuation

For the ancient Romans, "Terminus" was the god of boundaries, represented as large stones used to divide and delimit fields. Festivals were held, called Terminalia, in which the stones that "generated" human space were sanctified. Our word "term" is the heir of that god, or better, it is that god incorporated into an everyday space, in our Lebenswelt or world of life. A philosophical term, whatever its semantic content, is the conceptual mark that we make by establishing a referential sign, it is the action of determining, of generating a reference in a mental space, a reference with which we make a sign correspond, or if we deal with a physical space, the correspondence with an object, be it a milestone, a stone, or an indicator sign. Since its beginnings, philosophy has used binary semantic terms as thinking tools, something that analytical psychology has also made good use of. One of the longest-running binary semantic terms for psychology...