Another
trait of human law ontology is offered in the concept of self-reliance, not so
much in Emerson’s terms, as a dialectic of great men and their struggle with
their society -an annex to genius religions- but as the feeling of being at home in
life. This is my life, my here and now in the living process, and I trust it in
its plain movements, accept its limitations and particular nonsenses, our
meaningful and meaningless myths. I soar with its high hormones and get low on
frustrations, for life is my house no less than death and oblivion and
astronomical dances of annihilation; I know it and do not deny it anymore.
Emerson
proposed: insist on yourself, never imitate. Such naïve adolescent bravery –I recognize
it for I had it too- is a drive towards individuation that can hardly be
avoided, and is felt in different degrees by all, therefore is the common, the
opposed to your individual self (that narrative of your emotions in relation to
the group), and not by imitation, but by genetic programming (another kind of mimesis), by the force of
emotions which impose their protocols time and again. I don’t want to be
unique, I couldn’t anyway, that’s sheer madness of the ancient myths of the
King God. I rather be the embracing breath of thought. I trust thinking for it
is not only mine, but yours too, and the voice of the dead. How could life be
without the words of the dead? Their tiny nucleic words.
Could we
rely on aminoacid soups? Should we?
Comments
Post a Comment
Please write here your comments