Skip to main content

Could we be spontaneous?

While the previous two antinomies of reason examined the contradictions in the use of concepts of our basic space-time intuition, such as the idea of a beginning or of basic quanta, Kant’s third antinomy mixes the basic intuition of causality with the moral concept of freedom, two notions of different conceptual order. The result is a rather confusing argument, though the reductio ad absurdum works beautifully simple by the appeal to the epistemological principle of conceivability: an object can only be conceived through a defined and finite sequence of mental processes.
Let us understand by cause a necessary relation between events (objects, relations) which defines a temporal sequence of those events within a particular conceptual frame.
A. Causality according to laws of nature is not the only way to derive the relations and objects of a given scenario: we must include also causality according to freedom.
1. Assume that there is only causality according to the laws of nature (CN).
2. Everything that happens in a given scenario, its objects and relations, the whole scenario itself, implies a previous state of its elements. The regress in the causal chain can be extended ad infinitum.
3. According to the principle of conceivability, such process cannot be conceived, i.e. it does not produce any cognition. But the foundation of CN is that we can conceive nature through it.
4. Thus there must be a form of causality different from CN that accounts for an spontaneous beginning in causality.
∴ A is correct.
B. CN is the only principle at work in nature: There is no freedom or spontaneity of any class.
1. Assume that there is freedom as an especial form of causality (CF).
2. A scenario and its objects could then be just spontaneously produced following CF and not CN.
3. We can conceive such a finite sequence if it is well defined, however, the connection of the events in CF do not follow a necessary connection, for the freedom or spontaneity implies that the action might be initiated or not, i.e. it is contingent and not necessary.
4. Then, a free action cannot be considered a causal action at all.
∴ B is correct.
A and B cannot be both correct.


In terms of physics, any initial movement not defined explicitly within a particular conceptual frame of physics is nothing but a transcendental object which produces antinomies. Human freedom is a moral object defined in psychological and social terms, not translatable to the basic magnitudes of physics.
In terms of morals, the will receives different mythological interpretations according to the exomorphic representations used in the construction of social and individual identity. In morals, it is the contingent character of the action what defines the actor within a particular frame, while in physics it is the necessary character of the action what defines the object within a particular frame.
The question of how much are we conditioned in our actions, has to include the physical (physiological) and the moral conditionings. Neuroscience shows a greater conditioning that we would like to admit in relation to our sacred realm of morals. Freedom is basically a juridical concept. Nonetheless, there is a realm where our actions become like those of the ancient gods: aesthetics, understood as our will to create, to compose, to make variations, to name, to connect the unconnected…
What is to improvise? To let dance life in us. What is to choose? A wonderful belief in our autonomy. For Walt Whitman there was no conflict. An easy equation: Spontaneous me, Nature.
Labels:

Comments

  1. ESENCIAMay 31, 2017 at 6:31 PM

    This is a very interesting view and it make us think about the meaning of freedom.....

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please write here your comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is Mythopoetics?

  The narrative grew in the process of being told, as myths always do. The Blog has become more labyrinthine over the years. It contains my Mythopoetics book and a few other things. For those who access these texts without knowing anything about Mythopoetics, I am going to post the introduction of the first part, so you can decide if you want to spend your precious time thinking about the identity narratives that we humans have developed over the years. throughout our eventful existence as a species. "Mythological narratives are the only intellectual activity that has been continuously practiced by human beings, a fact that makes them a unique tool for thinking synthetically our evolution as homo-sapiens. In this sense, they are the first valuation settings that humans have made about themselves and their environment, and as such, they have conditioned the ones that have come afterwards, both in form and content. Their communicative function places them at the basis o...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Epistemological Perspective of Individuation

For the ancient Romans, "Terminus" was the god of boundaries, represented as large stones used to divide and delimit fields. Festivals were held, called Terminalia, in which the stones that "generated" human space were sanctified. Our word "term" is the heir of that god, or better, it is that god incorporated into an everyday space, in our Lebenswelt or world of life. A philosophical term, whatever its semantic content, is the conceptual mark that we make by establishing a referential sign, it is the action of determining, of generating a reference in a mental space, a reference with which we make a sign correspond, or if we deal with a physical space, the correspondence with an object, be it a milestone, a stone, or an indicator sign. Since its beginnings, philosophy has used binary semantic terms as thinking tools, something that analytical psychology has also made good use of. One of the longest-running binary semantic terms for psychology...
Post a Comment
Read more