Let me
insist on the scope of the concept of individuation,
for it is fundamental to understand the structure of myth.
In Agamemnon, Aeschilus expresses, paradoxically, what is
probably the first register of the social context of the phenomenon of individuation: I have my own mind, separated from the
others.[1] The fact that we understand what he
is saying is a proof of its falsity, for an isolated mind could not make itself
understood.
1. I cannot think or express my
individuation without a language.
2. Languages are group constructions,
never individual.
Therefore, I cannot think or express
my individuation with individual terms.
But when I think or express my
individuation, the group does not articulate my voice.
The paradox
is solved if we understand that identities are narrations. My individual body
is a narration (just have a look to the narratives of Anima Mundi about the human
body, and compare it with those of molecular biology), and the identities of my
group and my persona, are narrations.
We can only
think individuation in social terms, or, with other words: individual identity
is a question of communication and social action.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please write here your comments