The concept
of anima mundi gave the first general
epistemological frame to human beings. The world appeared as a representation
thanks to the unified image of experience that it allowed, putting a reference
frame for our actions. Nevertheless, the concept is loaded with a full set of
contradictions, something obvious in the study of the myths of the cold
societies. These paradoxes have been overlooked in the construction of the
immortality myths of both the plane of the King-God and the universal law, and
are responsible not only for misunderstandings about the narratives of the
individual but also of all sorts of manipulations and narratives of domination.
Here I just mention a few aporiae.
In the
myths of the anima mundi plane, the soul is a common principle to living and
not living beings. In this sense, therefore, is either a property of everything
or we can say that everything is soul. If the first case, i.e., the soul is a
property, we are implying that there is something else which is not the soul
and which is, somehow, more simple, something that can have or not the property.
If it had always the property, then it wouldn’t be a property, but part of its definition.
What could be such a simple monad of which the soul is a property?
On the
other hand, if everything is soul, the individual or monad (not in Leibnizian
terms, but simply as the idea of a conceptual unit for reasoning, like natural
numbers) would be a property of the soul, and therefore, would not be a monad (for properties are second or n-ary determinations).
Comments
Post a Comment
Please write here your comments