Skip to main content

Is there a relationship in early cultures between debt and guilt?

 The link between monetary debt and sin is found in the Rigveda, or in the Bible, but in one way or

another, we find the idea expressed in all mythological traditions: the life created by divinity

implies a debt to supernatural powers, or, in terms of mythopoetics, a permanent debt to the group,

to which the lives of its individuals literally belong.

Sin is going against the will of the group, and not recognizing subordination to authority. The debt

is paid with one's life, either a miserable existence as a slave or by losing it all at once in a ritual public execution. Monetary myths are fundamental to the exchanges that constitute the city, and the

city, as it extends beyond its borders, has to universalize the concept of debt to include new client-

citizens, either as slaves or as relatively free men. Behind the idea of debt, we find the centrality of

the social emotion of solidarity, but its complex elaborations entail the mixture of the different

“wills to power” of the subgroups that make up the city. Social solidarity in cold societies is a

particularization of the natural solidarity between all living beings that make up the anima mundi,

the symbolic principle with which the human being began to give meaning to existence. However,

in stratified societies, the principle is replaced by that of civilizing divinities, who give the

principles of agriculture and law, synthesized in the figure of the King-God, to whom mortals have

the eternal debt of its creation. Debt is the economic narrative, perfectly translatable into basic

emotional terms, that produce the narratives of primitive determination that deal with guilt.

Debt-guilt becomes the fundamental narrative bond of identity, a narrative of domination that unites

as well as energizes the actions of the group. The difference between the will of the King-God (and

the castes representing him) and that of the citizen, who is born within a civilized structure of

complex symbolic order, is conditioned by this initial situation. In exchange for shelter and

sustenance, the city collects its debt by limiting access to the benefits of labor synergy, and above

all, through exploitation. The lower castes always owe something to the higher ones. It is an

immaterial and metaphysical debt that is always paid with subordination and life, which is the

property of the community, that is, the patrimony of the King-God The legitimation of the city's

action outside its borders is based on its debt-guilt structure: the civilized city carries the order of

the true God, and such order implies a debt contracted by the civilized, which is valued in energy, in

resources, which, with the appropriate accounts, are equivalent to money. But mythological

construction is a sine qua non for the civilizing debt process to work, a transcendental narrative that

has to be complemented by economic narratives of work and money.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

What is Mythopoetics?

  The narrative grew in the process of being told, as myths always do. The Blog has become more labyrinthine over the years. It contains my Mythopoetics book and a few other things. For those who access these texts without knowing anything about Mythopoetics, I am going to post the introduction of the first part, so you can decide if you want to spend your precious time thinking about the identity narratives that we humans have developed over the years. throughout our eventful existence as a species. "Mythological narratives are the only intellectual activity that has been continuously practiced by human beings, a fact that makes them a unique tool for thinking synthetically our evolution as homo-sapiens. In this sense, they are the first valuation settings that humans have made about themselves and their environment, and as such, they have conditioned the ones that have come afterwards, both in form and content. Their communicative function places them at the basis o...

An Epistemological Perspective of Individuation

For the ancient Romans, "Terminus" was the god of boundaries, represented as large stones used to divide and delimit fields. Festivals were held, called Terminalia, in which the stones that "generated" human space were sanctified. Our word "term" is the heir of that god, or better, it is that god incorporated into an everyday space, in our Lebenswelt or world of life. A philosophical term, whatever its semantic content, is the conceptual mark that we make by establishing a referential sign, it is the action of determining, of generating a reference in a mental space, a reference with which we make a sign correspond, or if we deal with a physical space, the correspondence with an object, be it a milestone, a stone, or an indicator sign. Since its beginnings, philosophy has used binary semantic terms as thinking tools, something that analytical psychology has also made good use of. One of the longest-running binary semantic terms for psychology...