Skip to main content

Slavery as dependence in relation to a mythico-ritual axis

 It is very likely that the legal idea of ​​belonging to a person, slavery, developed in small steps of administration of the most basic social persons within other more complex collectives: those of gender, totem, or caste. In fact, it does not seem that until today there has been a single human society in which the subject, in any of its social persons, has not been considered as conditioned to the will of the group, as an object owned by the community, with an independent life only as long as there is no group urgency, or only in moments when the social function is not active. And this dependence reaches the kings themselves and the gods. Dependency within cold societies occurred reciprocally, and as a need based on basic social emotion: the individual cannot be without the group. However, in complex urban societies, although the same emotional system operates, the group is divided into subgroups with dominance conflicts between them, so the dependence of one caste on another, and in general, on a person with respect to another, comes from subordination with respect to a mythical-ritual structure. The king of Babylon could not exercise his power outside the mythical structure of the city: he depends on Marduk, and his subjects as subjects of Marduk, and obedience to his person is given to the extent that he assumes and interprets within a few rules, the person of the king. Thus, for example, the fact that during the Akitu there was a moment in which the king was publicly humiliated, did not imply the humiliation of Marduk, but the reversion to a mythical order prior to the city, emotionally more basic, in which neither the person of the king nor that of the priests made sense neither those of the rest of the urban people, a reversal towards the genre and age persons, expression of the more basic individuations of the members of the group. When the king returns to his royal person, he becomes immediately the representative (most of the time as a son or alter ego) of the mythical God of the city (traditionally a God of the Storm). In the same way, the power of the priests and nobles over others was a function of their performance in the social drama and not the cause of direct dependencies (asymmetrically reciprocal) with respect to slaves and serfs. The dependency is not in relation to a city-state, it is not the dependency with respect to a geographical location, nor with respect to the figure of the god or the king, but in relation to a mythico-ritual structure, and more specifically, with respect to the economic success of this structure, that is, its ability to solve nutritional, environmental and war threats. 

Within the social persona of the gods, we observe a minimum of two divine generations within this mythical plane. The gods of the Anima Mundi were the great civilizing ancestors, fused with a totem, either animal or vegetable, or a meteorological or natural force. With the passage of time, the human character of the ancestor is lost in stereotyped narratives linked to specific rites and economic actions, it is transformed into a collective person that functions in a transgenerational way, to which the representations elaborated by the priestly caste based on the complexity of the new urban communities, which include the economic actions of mythical-ritual agricultural schemes. This first generation of gods is challenged by the appearance of external demographic pressures, which produce readjustments of their personalities or directly their destruction. The stories of this mythical plane have a clear cosmogonic character, narratives of heroic struggles and events, of changes of order. The battles for economic determinations are related to primitive determinations. Historical enemies are also mythical, in a type of narrative that, to this day, has not abandoned us at all. The war to expel the Hyksos, worshipers of Seth, the enemy brother of Osiris, from the delta of the Nile, is the earthly performance of the cosmic battle of the Osiris myth, as had been the founding fight of Babylon on the part of Marduk, as will be the dynastic succession of the Mahabharata between Kurus and Pandavas in the struggle for the city of discernment, Hastinapura (City of Elephants), in a cosmic cycle of battles between good and evil, as will be the war narratives against Nazi power on the part of the allied forces, or that of Islam against the demonized West that the fundamentalisms of our day proclaim.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please write here your comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is Mythopoetics?

  The narrative grew in the process of being told, as myths always do. The Blog has become more labyrinthine over the years. It contains my Mythopoetics book and a few other things. For those who access these texts without knowing anything about Mythopoetics, I am going to post the introduction of the first part, so you can decide if you want to spend your precious time thinking about the identity narratives that we humans have developed over the years. throughout our eventful existence as a species. "Mythological narratives are the only intellectual activity that has been continuously practiced by human beings, a fact that makes them a unique tool for thinking synthetically our evolution as homo-sapiens. In this sense, they are the first valuation settings that humans have made about themselves and their environment, and as such, they have conditioned the ones that have come afterwards, both in form and content. Their communicative function places them at the basis o...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Epistemological Perspective of Individuation

For the ancient Romans, "Terminus" was the god of boundaries, represented as large stones used to divide and delimit fields. Festivals were held, called Terminalia, in which the stones that "generated" human space were sanctified. Our word "term" is the heir of that god, or better, it is that god incorporated into an everyday space, in our Lebenswelt or world of life. A philosophical term, whatever its semantic content, is the conceptual mark that we make by establishing a referential sign, it is the action of determining, of generating a reference in a mental space, a reference with which we make a sign correspond, or if we deal with a physical space, the correspondence with an object, be it a milestone, a stone, or an indicator sign. Since its beginnings, philosophy has used binary semantic terms as thinking tools, something that analytical psychology has also made good use of. One of the longest-running binary semantic terms for psychology...
Post a Comment
Read more