Skip to main content

Psychological self, transcendental Self, Atman

 

We look for a permanent term, something to hold on to, that serves as a reference when the whirlwind of becoming is no longer valid as a reliable explanation and everyday experience says nothing about our identity. There is nothing anywhere that tells us that such a foundation makes sense, just a basic intuition about something genuine in our existence that seems to suggest the concept of something fundamental and permanent. Different mythical traditions offered a wide variety of possible terms that exhausted the senses of the concept of divinity. The last of these, that of contemporary science, loses itself in the inherent limitations of the paradoxical logic that it uses, and in exchange for the toys of technology, it keeps the promises of a scientific foundation for existence that is merely a metaphysical phantasmagoria.

We then return to the subject that we think we are, disenchanted with the objects that satisfied our childish curiosity, and by doing this we realize that we were already underway, that we were being the reference we were looking for, we simply did not suspect that our need for a foundation is precisely what points to the foundation. When we looked for the permanent term we doubted that the point at which we were standing was solid enough to provide the foundation, and this doubt was already an unspoken question, the most basic, the most genuine. A question expresses a wish, and the wish is dissatisfaction, doubt about the current state. We seek fulfillment, satisfaction, the dissolution of the question, or what is the same, a total indubitability, and we find that what is undoubted is the desire to find, the annulment of the desire in its fulfillment. The desire-question is prior to reflective thought, it is not made by the psychological self, which builds and responds from the past, from memory, both personal and transpersonal. It is about a different self, that shows a desire to know before any personal story is elaborated, that doubts any narration, of any conditioning established by memory, by the group, a self that deliberately suspends any belief, trying to arrive naked in the here and now. This is the transcendental Self of which phenomenological philosophy has spoken, which has been awarded the ability to lead the thought that takes us to the foundation. It is a personal Self that would like to be impersonal and offer a transparent image of Reality, but it cannot stop being an object that is projected onto mental objects and shapes them. The transcendental subject is not the Atman because it is an "I am the inquisitive thought", it is the minimum form that the desire-question takes, and therefore an object. No object can be a permanent term, since it is only a representation. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

Rhapsodies of Anima Mundi: Fear of Death

In the nascent dawn of consciousness, when the human spirit still danced in rhythmic harmony with the grand, elemental pulse of nature, the enigma of cessation—that profound silence we name death—arose as the most formidable of shadows. Yet, it was not then perceived as an absolute, terminal end in the stark, isolated sense we often conceive today. For those early societies, intimately imbricated in the vast and primordial canvas of the Anima Mundi, death was seamlessly woven into the very ur-tapestry of existence as a continuity, a fluid dissolution into the great soul of the world, or a joyous return to a collective paradise, utterly devoid of the strict, solitary individuation that modernity has, unwittingly, imposed upon us. This is not merely the clinical apprehension of biological cessation, but rather a primordial panic before the void, a visceral anguish in the face of the "I's" dissolution and the potential loss of all that imbues life with meaning. Confronted...

Shamans and the development of Social Masks

  The growing dissociation of new social persons (social masks) from a single primitive mask that brings them together occurs due to the specialization processes that require increasingly complex economic actions. From the mask of the shaman, compatible with the masks of man or woman, but not with the child mask, unfold the social masks of the founding hero, the priest (priestess), the poet, or depositary of narrative memory, the doctor, the meteorology controller, and even the holy king. The shamanic powers are either the result of a search or of a spontaneous happening within a human lineage, which from the point of view of the professionalism of the economic action of shamanism is irrelevant, since it is the work of a specialist for communication with the Anima Mundi. In fact, the lineage transmission of social persons is not exclusive to shamanic professional practice. The shaman is not an individual person any more than the social person of the old man can be. I...