Skip to main content

Conocer como Ser


¿Cual es el conocimiento que nos permite conocer todas las demás cosas? La pregunta es del Upanishad. La respuesta es: el conocimiento del Ser, Atman, en la terminología del sánscrito. No se trata de conocer un axioma fundamental del que se deriva cualquier conocimiento, sino de la idea de conocer al conocedor: si conoces al que conoce, conoces cuanto pueda conocer. Pero ¿cómo conocemos al sujeto fundamental si por definición, el sujeto es lo que no es objetibable y por tanto no cognoscible? La respuesta es sencilla: siendo ese sujeto, es decir, siendo el Ser. Es tan simple como ser lo que somos, y para ello no hay que hacer nada, ya está hecho, y sigue haciéndose. ¿Por qué entonces sigo desconociendo todas las cosas? ¿Por qué, por ejemplo, la estructura fundamental de la materia me sigue siendo desconocida y sólo tengo teorías cambiantes? Porque el artífice de esas teorías (la comunidad científica) es un pseudo-sujeto, y sólo obtiene representaciones fraccionarias, siempre incompletas, siempre a punto de dar la respuesta cuando aparece algo nuevo en el sistema teórico que lleva el horizonte de conocimiento un poco más lejos, asintóticamente. El nudo sólo se deshace siendo Atman, y desde allí, dejando venir la pregunta. Esto sería conocer como ser, un fundamento epistemológico distinto al de nuestras ciencias.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please write here your comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rhapsodies of Anima Mundi: Fear of Death

In the nascent dawn of consciousness, when the human spirit still danced in rhythmic harmony with the grand, elemental pulse of nature, the enigma of cessation—that profound silence we name death—arose as the most formidable of shadows. Yet, it was not then perceived as an absolute, terminal end in the stark, isolated sense we often conceive today. For those early societies, intimately imbricated in the vast and primordial canvas of the Anima Mundi, death was seamlessly woven into the very ur-tapestry of existence as a continuity, a fluid dissolution into the great soul of the world, or a joyous return to a collective paradise, utterly devoid of the strict, solitary individuation that modernity has, unwittingly, imposed upon us. This is not merely the clinical apprehension of biological cessation, but rather a primordial panic before the void, a visceral anguish in the face of the "I's" dissolution and the potential loss of all that imbues life with meaning. Confronted...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Torch in the Frontier of the Night

 From the point of view of human psychological transpersonality, we are the generations of the future. Our human lineage is a continuum of soul expressions of the Dance of the Cosmos. Passing the torch of the Sacred Fire is like making marks on the path so that we can see them and remember them, already being others, in times that today we consider future, but that are part of this same Trikala, this sphere of temporality in which our civilization moves, recreating the meanings of the past and the future. The general mythopoetic process of our humanity walked an ascending line of symbolization that has followed the paths of the Anima Mundi, the King-God, the Universal Law, and the Human Law. This last mythopoetic stage has never been fully achieved. We have identified the human with a specific way of thinking that has been declared absolute by ourselves: rationality. First, as philosophical rationality and then as technical rationality, to express the forms of control of Nature. Hu...
3 comments
Read more